Prevalence and clinical manifestations of drug eruptions in hospitalized patients: a ten-year cross-sectional observational study in a tertiary care hospital in Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47196/sm88w798Keywords:
drug eruptions, drug-induced skin reaction, maculopapular exanthemaAbstract
Introduction: adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with cutaneous, mucosal, and/or adnexal involvement, known as drug-induced dermatoses (pharmacodermias), are among the most frequent manifestations of drug-related adverse effects. It is estimated that 10–30% of ADRs affect the skin and that 2–10% of hospitalized patients develop drug-induced cutaneous manifestation.
Objectives: to determine the prevalence of drug eruptions among hospitalized patients at Hospital Universitario Austral during the period from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2024, and to describe their main clinical, therapeutic, and evolutionary characteristics.
Materials and methods: cross-sectional, descriptive study. All patients ≥18 years old hospitalized with a clinical diagnosis of drug-induced dermatosis confirmed by the Dermatology Department were included.
Results: a total of 110 patients were analyzed, with a prevalence of 0.073% of drug-induced skin reactions. The mean age was 55 years, with a male predominance. Maculopapular rash was the most frequent presentation (69.1%), followed by drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (14.5%) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (5.5%). The latency period was 5-8 days in most cases and 21 days in Stevens-Johnson syndrome. A causative drug was identified in 60.9% of cases, mainly beta-lactam and glycopeptide antibiotics; in 39.1%, a single agent could not be determined. Complete recovery occurred in 97.3% of patients.
Conclusions: the prevalence was low and outcomes were generally favorable. Antibiotics were the most frequently implicated drugs; however, in a considerable proportion of cases, the causative agent could not be identified. Early diagnosis may reduce drug-related morbidity and mortality.
References
I. Moreno-Ordaz L G, López-Zenteno B E, Díaz-Greene E J, Rodríguez-Weber F L, et al. Características epidemiológicas de las farmacodermias en un hospital privado. Acta Méd Grupo Ángeles. 2021;19:76-80.
II. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Buenas prácticas de farmacovigilancia para las Américas. Washington, DC: OPS; 2011. (Red PARF. Documento técnico No. 5). Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/sites/default/files/BPFv-de-las-Americas--5-nov.pdf.
III. Del Pozzo-Magaña BR, Liy-Wong C. Drugs and the skin. A concise review of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;90:1838-55.
IV. Hung SI, Mockenhaupt M, Blumenthal KG, Abe R, et al. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024;10:30.
V. Owen CE, Jones JM. Recognition and management of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis). Med Clin North Am. 2021;105:577-597.
VI. Rajendran L, Thyvalappil A, Sridharan R, Ajayakumar S, et al. A study of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care center in South India. Clin Dermatol Rev. 2021;5:173-177.
VII. Patel RM, Marfatia YS. Clinical study of cutaneous drug eruptions in 200 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74:80.
VIII. Hina A, Masood S, Jamil S, Tabassum S, et al. Prevalence of clinical spectrum of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in patients presenting at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Cureus. 2021;13:e14568.
IX. Tempark T, John S, Rerknimitr P, Satapornpong P, et al. Drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Insights into clinical presentation, immunopathogenesis, diagnostic methods, treatment, and pharmacogenomics. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 832048.
X. Campos-Fernández M, Ponce-De-León-Rosales S, Archer-Dubon C, Orozco-Topete R. Incidence and risk factors for cutaneous adverse drug reactions in an intensive care unit. Rev Invest Clin. 2005;57:770-774.
XI. Bonetto VN, Salduna MD, Ruiz Lascano AR. Farmacodermia: clínica y epidemiología. Alerg Inmunol Clin. 2022;41:9–16.
XII. Osanlou R, Walker L, Hughes DA, Burnside G, et al. Adverse drug reactions, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. A prospective analysis of 1 month of medical admissions. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e055551.
XIII. Srisuriyachanchai W, Cox AR, Kampichit S, Jarernsiripornkul N. Severity and management of adverse drug reactions reported by patients and healthcare professionals. A cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:3725.
XIV. Parisi R, Shah H, Navarini AA, Muehleisen B, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: clinical features, differential diagnosis, and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023; 24:557-575.
XV. Kroshinsky D, Cardones ARG, Blumenthal KG. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:2242-2254.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 On behalf of the authors. Reproduction rights: Argentine Dermatology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
El/los autor/es tranfieren todos los derechos de autor del manuscrito arriba mencionado a Dermatología Argentina en el caso de que el trabajo sea publicado. El/los autor/es declaran que el artículo es original, que no infringe ningún derecho de propiedad intelectual u otros derechos de terceros, que no se encuentra bajo consideración de otra revista y que no ha sido previamente publicado.
Le solicitamos haga click aquí para imprimir, firmar y enviar por correo postal la transferencia de los derechos de autor